After Matt Reeves’The Batmanwas met with widespread acclaim from fans and critics alike and pulled in $770.8 million at the worldwide box office, Warner Bros. quickly confirmed that a sequel was in development. There’s a third movie planned, and two streaming spin-offs coming to HBO Max, but Reeves is taking this Bat-verse one project at a time and focusing onThe Batman 2for now. There are many things inThe Batmanthat work great that Reeves should keep the same in the sequel, but there’s also one big area for improvement.
The Batmanworks best as a character study exploring the damaged psyche of its titular crimefighter. But on top of that compelling character work,The Batmanalso has a bloated, overcomplicated, decidedly less compelling plot that requires the audience to make a few leaps of logic. It’s impossible to faultthe film’s nuanced acting, immersive cinematography, mesmerizing music, razor-sharp editing, or even other aspects of the script like pacing and characterization; the plot isThe Batman’s biggest weakness. The sequel needs a less convoluted plot and more focus on character.
RELATED:The Batman’s Opening Montage Is The Perfect Character Introduction
The best parts ofThe Batmanhave nothing to do with the plot. Robert Pattinson, Zoë Kravitz, Jeffrey Wright, Paul Dano, and an unrecognizable Colin Farrell all bring their iconic DC Comics roles to life like never before with grounded, brooding performances. Cinematographer Greig Fraser created a living, breathing Gotham with rain-soaked streets, minimal lighting, and soft-edged compositions shot on glorious anamorphic lenses. ComposerMichael Giacchino’s moody melodiescreated a beautifully morose atmosphere, and his score has one thing missing from most of today’s superhero movie music: recognizable themes. The three-hour runtime was heavily criticized, but it doesn’t feel three hours long because editors William Hoy and Tyler Nelson keepThe Batmanmoving forward. The upcoming sequel needs to retain all these elements, but it also needs to pare back the plot.
Reeves’ Bat-reboot borrowed from ‘70s neo-noirs whose minimalist storytelling served their character development. His characterization of Batman is drawn from the antiheroes of these neo-noirs:the eponymous socially awkward detective fromKlute, the honest lawman surrounded by crooked cops inSerpico, the insomniac vigilante who reads his diary entries as voiceover narration inTaxi Driver. In all of these movies, character takes precedence over plot, and the films are more engaging and rewatchable as a result.
ThroughoutThe Batman’s mammoth runtime, Reeves rounds outhis unique portrayal of Bruce Wayneas a three-dimensional human being. The movie offers a glimpse into a deeply disturbed mind: Pattinson’s Bruce rarely sleeps, rarely takes off the cowl, and doesn’t bother to keep up appearances as a billionaire playboy. The complex plot points feel like a distraction from what the movie really succeeds at, and they take the spotlight away from Pattinson’s incredible performance.
A big-screen Batman detective story was a great idea in theory. The hard-boiled serial killer plot put the Bat’s most underutilized trait – the sleuthing skills that earned him the nickname of “World’s Greatest Detective” – in center stage for the first time in his on-screen history. ButThe Batman’s mystery storyline takes way too many steps to get to its endgame. There area few unnecessary red herringsalong the way. As soon as “el rata alada” has been translated to “the rat with wings,” Batman and Gordon run through all the characters named after winged animals, which is basically all of them: the Penguin, Carmine Falcone, Batman himself.
The meandering murder mystery would be a lot more effective if the payoffs had anything to do with the setups. The carpet tucker clue is a random left turn. The Caped Crusader solves the case because a cop on the scene happens to know a lot about carpets and there’s a carpet on the floorcovering up the Riddler’s master plan. That master plan comes out of nowhere, too. Gotham’s seawall is never mentioned until the Riddler suddenly detonates a bunch of bombs along it to flood the city andtack on a big climactic battle sequencein the already-overstuffed third act. The plotting in the sequel shouldn’t be anywhere near as dense and overwrought.
Mr. Freeze has been floated as a possibility for the sequel’s villain. Although he might seem like a one-note villain with ludicrous ice powers and even more ludicrous ice-based puns, Mr. Freeze would be perfect forThe Batman 2. Unlike the Riddler, he doesn’t invite complications to the script. He’s humanized by his sympathetic quest to cure his wife’s terminal illness. Mr. Freeze isn’t out to prove a point about Gotham’s corrupt one-percenters; he wants nothing more than to save the love of his life. If Mr. Freeze is the villain,The Batman 2would have more focus on internal conflicts like emotional pain and personal motivations than external conflicts like riddles and death traps.
